All organizations, prompts, values, dates, and outputs in this example are synthetic. Tool results depend on the authorized brand, filters, and stored data.
Weekly performance review
A workflow for recording trends, comparing providers, and investigating topic differences with a consistent scope.Check the trend
Is my visibility improving or declining?
Is my visibility improving or declining?
You:Show me my visibility trend over the last 30 days, grouped by week.Claude:Visibility trend for TechFlow (weekly):
Trend: Improving (+7% from first to second half). Week 12 dipped but Week 13 recovered strongly with your best numbers yet.
Compare providers
Which providers have the highest and lowest observed rates?
Which providers have the highest and lowest observed rates?
You:Break this down by AI provider.Claude:Provider breakdown (last 30 days):
Highest observed visibility: ChatGPT (49%, with the highest sentiment value in this sample).Lowest observed visibility: Gemini (30%). This table does not identify the cause; inspect the underlying prompts, answers, sources, and comparable provider coverage before forming a hypothesis.
Find the topic gaps
Which topics need attention?
Which topics need attention?
You:Show me performance by topic.Claude:Topic performance:
Highest observed score: Project Management (74) in this sample.Lowest observed score: Time Tracking (28). Review the underlying answers and competitor mentions before deciding whether this is a content or positioning gap.
Read the visibility matrix
Show me topics × providers to find exact weak spots
Show me topics × providers to find exact weak spots
You:Show me the full visibility matrix.Claude:GEO Matrix (last 30 days):
Pattern: Gemini has the lowest value in every topic row shown. In the Time Tracking × Gemini cell, TechFlow records 14% and a selected competitor records 52%. The competitor also has landing pages for these queries, but the matrix does not establish that those pages caused the difference.